Thursday, April 21, 2016

Final Exam

State and Local Government
Spring 2016

Final Exam


Welcome. Today, we gather to discuss the troubles that have overtaken our communities here in the once-happy region of Los Felices. Since the attempted power grab by the wayward urbanites in San Los one year ago, our rural communities have been wary. Bitter.

Blinded by ambition, the young professionals of San Los forgot that money is only one measure of a successful life. They brushed aside their elders when they should have sought wisdom from their elders. They tried to trick their neighboring communities into a regional plan that would have benefited only the pockets of San Losians at the expense of everyone else in Los Felices. They forgot that strong communities rise and fall together… that no-one succeeds if the community as a whole is suffering.

When the real intent of the San Los scheme was uncovered, our neighbors in Diversaville naturally felt betrayed. No temporary reduction in port fees was worth ceding Diversaville’s access to the mouth of Overflow Canal. The citizens of Diversaville grow our local food and maintain a small but productive export industry… they deserve our appreciation and unimpeded access to a port from which to sell their goods. And they deserve for their desire for better eduational opportunities for their children to be taken seriously. If Diversaville thrives, Los Felices as a whole will thrive.

Dellatons, too, felt betrayed when they learned that the senior condos promised along the north shore open space area would be so costly that our own seniors, the elders of San Los itself, would not be able to afford them. That the senior condo development contract was promised to a real estate development firm owned by the mayor’s husband, who stood to make millions from the deal. The citizens of Dellatown stood to lose their beloved open space and their access to the ocean so that rich politicians from the city could get richer.

Even our most highly educated teachers and technical professionals in our dear college town of Neverland were nearly fooled by the San Losians into accepting short term investments of money in exchange for a long term brain drain of talent.  Angered, our three rural communities joined together into an understandable, but misguided alliance to rebel against these aggressions from the city.

But aggression can’t stop aggression. San Los had indeed begun to earn its cynical nickname, San Lost. Some in our communities even began to refer to our neighbors not as San Losians but as San Losers. But name-calling and punishing San Los will not bring harmony back to Los Felices. As with our good neighbors in Diversaville, our neighbors in San Los must thrive if Los Felices is to thrive. We must find a way to work together.

When Dellaton, Diversaville and Neverland dammed the River San, diverting its flow to Overflow Canal, they changed our local river ecosystem. Fish attempting to swim upriver to spawn are blocked by the dam and they don’t know how to find the new outlet at Overflow Canal. Seawater is making its way farther and farther inland, damaging the riverbank. And now there’s talk of a second dam to hold it back. Enough is enough.

Los Felices needs a Regional River District with equitable representation for urban and rural populations so that our river management practices support the flourishing of all our communities. This must include the animals that live in and near the river, as well as the river ecosystem as a whole. Removal of the dam, and restoration of the river’s natural flow is a top priority.

Question 1
Why might a regional solution be appropriate for Los Felices? What negative consequences might result? Can you think of a better solution?














Question 2
The Los Felices Regional River District plan will move forward expeditiously. Each town must pitch in for the cost of managing the LFRRD. Something will have to be cut from the budget in order to make these payments. Either that, or citizens will have to accept a tax increase. Which will you do?






















Question 3
In trying to wrest control of the region back to itself after the San Dam went in, San Los City pushed through a blatantly gerrymandered redistricting scheme. Why are the borders in this scheme unfair?














3b) Having been brought down by their own ambition, the urbanites of San Los were, however, finally humbled and realized that they had caused division within the region. That’s why they asked an elder to propose the peace initiative being worked through today. As part of this initiative, they have nullified their own gerrymandered redistricting scheme and offered to work with all communities of Los Felices to draw up a fair and equitable new set of districts that will actively prevent discord from developing again in the future. How would you re-draw the boundaries to meet this goal? Explain your drawing.















4) Now that the LFRRD is established to cooperatively manage the river region, and the district lines have been re-drawn to actively prevent future discord, each new district should choose the form of local government that will be most effective for it going forward. Would you recommend a Strong Mayor, Weak Mayor, City Manager or City Commission style of local government for your newly-designed district? Why?
we are still waiting for the rest to arrive

Gerrymanders




















Saturday, April 9, 2016

Youth lawsuit over environmental damage

Should kids be able to sue for a safe climate? A federal judge just said yes.
Last month, in Eugene, Ore., a district court heard 21 youth plaintiffs’ arguments as to why their case should proceed to trial. The kids allege that by failing to act on climate change, the U.S. government — including the president and a handful of federal agencies — have violated several of their constitutional rights. As we reported in March:
The complaint alleges violation of the kids’ Fifth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection. By failing to act on climate change, it argues, the government discriminates against youth as a class. Without access to a healthy climate, they’re deprived of their fundamental rights to life, liberty, and property.
The complaint is also built on the public trust doctrine, a carryover from English common law that says a government has the duty to protect certain natural resources and systems on behalf of current and future generations. “It originated with Emperor Justinian in Rome,” Alex Loznak, a 19-year-old plaintiff, explained to the press. “It’s reflected in the Magna Carta, the writings of Thomas Jefferson, and cited in U.S. court decisions dating back to the 1800s.”
Backed by a slew of fossil fuel interests, the Justice Department filed a complaint arguing for the case’s dismissal. Now, with the new decision in hand, the 21 youth plaintiffs will head back to federal court for a proper hearing.
Said lead attorney Philip Gregory in a statement, “This decision is one of the most significant in our nation’s history.” If the kids win in the big leagues, that might actually be true.


http://registerguard.com/rg/news/local/34246737-75/federal-judge-in-eugene-says-court-should-not-dismiss-youths-climate-change-lawsuit.html.csp

http://registerguard.com/rg/news/local/34246737-75/federal-judge-in-eugene-says-court-should-not-dismiss-youths-climate-change-lawsuit.html.csp