Thursday, April 21, 2016

Final Exam

State and Local Government
Spring 2016

Final Exam


Welcome. Today, we gather to discuss the troubles that have overtaken our communities here in the once-happy region of Los Felices. Since the attempted power grab by the wayward urbanites in San Los one year ago, our rural communities have been wary. Bitter.

Blinded by ambition, the young professionals of San Los forgot that money is only one measure of a successful life. They brushed aside their elders when they should have sought wisdom from their elders. They tried to trick their neighboring communities into a regional plan that would have benefited only the pockets of San Losians at the expense of everyone else in Los Felices. They forgot that strong communities rise and fall together… that no-one succeeds if the community as a whole is suffering.

When the real intent of the San Los scheme was uncovered, our neighbors in Diversaville naturally felt betrayed. No temporary reduction in port fees was worth ceding Diversaville’s access to the mouth of Overflow Canal. The citizens of Diversaville grow our local food and maintain a small but productive export industry… they deserve our appreciation and unimpeded access to a port from which to sell their goods. And they deserve for their desire for better eduational opportunities for their children to be taken seriously. If Diversaville thrives, Los Felices as a whole will thrive.

Dellatons, too, felt betrayed when they learned that the senior condos promised along the north shore open space area would be so costly that our own seniors, the elders of San Los itself, would not be able to afford them. That the senior condo development contract was promised to a real estate development firm owned by the mayor’s husband, who stood to make millions from the deal. The citizens of Dellatown stood to lose their beloved open space and their access to the ocean so that rich politicians from the city could get richer.

Even our most highly educated teachers and technical professionals in our dear college town of Neverland were nearly fooled by the San Losians into accepting short term investments of money in exchange for a long term brain drain of talent.  Angered, our three rural communities joined together into an understandable, but misguided alliance to rebel against these aggressions from the city.

But aggression can’t stop aggression. San Los had indeed begun to earn its cynical nickname, San Lost. Some in our communities even began to refer to our neighbors not as San Losians but as San Losers. But name-calling and punishing San Los will not bring harmony back to Los Felices. As with our good neighbors in Diversaville, our neighbors in San Los must thrive if Los Felices is to thrive. We must find a way to work together.

When Dellaton, Diversaville and Neverland dammed the River San, diverting its flow to Overflow Canal, they changed our local river ecosystem. Fish attempting to swim upriver to spawn are blocked by the dam and they don’t know how to find the new outlet at Overflow Canal. Seawater is making its way farther and farther inland, damaging the riverbank. And now there’s talk of a second dam to hold it back. Enough is enough.

Los Felices needs a Regional River District with equitable representation for urban and rural populations so that our river management practices support the flourishing of all our communities. This must include the animals that live in and near the river, as well as the river ecosystem as a whole. Removal of the dam, and restoration of the river’s natural flow is a top priority.

Question 1
Why might a regional solution be appropriate for Los Felices? What negative consequences might result? Can you think of a better solution?














Question 2
The Los Felices Regional River District plan will move forward expeditiously. Each town must pitch in for the cost of managing the LFRRD. Something will have to be cut from the budget in order to make these payments. Either that, or citizens will have to accept a tax increase. Which will you do?






















Question 3
In trying to wrest control of the region back to itself after the San Dam went in, San Los City pushed through a blatantly gerrymandered redistricting scheme. Why are the borders in this scheme unfair?














3b) Having been brought down by their own ambition, the urbanites of San Los were, however, finally humbled and realized that they had caused division within the region. That’s why they asked an elder to propose the peace initiative being worked through today. As part of this initiative, they have nullified their own gerrymandered redistricting scheme and offered to work with all communities of Los Felices to draw up a fair and equitable new set of districts that will actively prevent discord from developing again in the future. How would you re-draw the boundaries to meet this goal? Explain your drawing.















4) Now that the LFRRD is established to cooperatively manage the river region, and the district lines have been re-drawn to actively prevent future discord, each new district should choose the form of local government that will be most effective for it going forward. Would you recommend a Strong Mayor, Weak Mayor, City Manager or City Commission style of local government for your newly-designed district? Why?
we are still waiting for the rest to arrive

Gerrymanders




















Saturday, April 9, 2016

Youth lawsuit over environmental damage

Should kids be able to sue for a safe climate? A federal judge just said yes.
Last month, in Eugene, Ore., a district court heard 21 youth plaintiffs’ arguments as to why their case should proceed to trial. The kids allege that by failing to act on climate change, the U.S. government — including the president and a handful of federal agencies — have violated several of their constitutional rights. As we reported in March:
The complaint alleges violation of the kids’ Fifth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection. By failing to act on climate change, it argues, the government discriminates against youth as a class. Without access to a healthy climate, they’re deprived of their fundamental rights to life, liberty, and property.
The complaint is also built on the public trust doctrine, a carryover from English common law that says a government has the duty to protect certain natural resources and systems on behalf of current and future generations. “It originated with Emperor Justinian in Rome,” Alex Loznak, a 19-year-old plaintiff, explained to the press. “It’s reflected in the Magna Carta, the writings of Thomas Jefferson, and cited in U.S. court decisions dating back to the 1800s.”
Backed by a slew of fossil fuel interests, the Justice Department filed a complaint arguing for the case’s dismissal. Now, with the new decision in hand, the 21 youth plaintiffs will head back to federal court for a proper hearing.
Said lead attorney Philip Gregory in a statement, “This decision is one of the most significant in our nation’s history.” If the kids win in the big leagues, that might actually be true.


http://registerguard.com/rg/news/local/34246737-75/federal-judge-in-eugene-says-court-should-not-dismiss-youths-climate-change-lawsuit.html.csp

http://registerguard.com/rg/news/local/34246737-75/federal-judge-in-eugene-says-court-should-not-dismiss-youths-climate-change-lawsuit.html.csp

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/trump-wisconsin-radio-interview-sykes-153316667.html

CE Reflection Questions

1)   Given what you know about this topic so far, please reflect on the heritage and values of the Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur in the context of your own values and belief system.
2)   What opportunities have you had so far at NDNU to develop relationships that honor the dignity or sacredness of each person or each being, including human and non-human beings? Why is this important? Have any of the Community Engagement activities you’ve done so far this semester given you opportunities to develop this?
3)   Have any ethical issues arisen yet during your time here as a member of the NDNU campus community? Did any of these arise out of your Community Engagement activities? Have you been challenged to assess your own ethical stances in any way? In what ways, if any, have these ethical considerations involved issues of justice or peace? In what ways, if any, have they caused you to change the way you think about your own future career choices?
4)   Have you, in the context of any class this first semester so far, had opportunities to apply classroom learning to address community or social problems? If so, did this make your classroom learning more successful in any way?
5)   How do you personally define diversity? What have you learned so far this semester about the challenges and rewards of embracing diversity? Is embracing diversity of value to the human and larger Earth communities?
6)   In what ways, if any, have you had opportunities so far this semester to build a sense of community with others? Who were the “others”? Were they students? Teachers? NDNU staff? Were they people you met through community engagement activities? Were they non-human beings? Do you feel that you built a sense of community for those others or with them?

7)   Have you had opportunites so far this semester to develop spiritual or ethical leadership skills in working toward a more just society? What specifically were those skills? How do you see yourself applying those skills during the remainder of your four years at NDNU and/or during your life and career after college?

Thursday, March 3, 2016

MIDTERM EXAM

State and Local Government, Spring 2016 / Andrews

MIDTERM EXAM


Please write 10-minute answers on five of the following subject areas:

1)         Discuss why and how people participate, or do not participate, in their democracy. Why is participation desirable? In what ways is it essential?
2)         Choose either one of our guest speakers or someone you’ve met through your community partner project – it should be someone who inspires you in some way. Discuss the subtle and obvious ways in which this person participates. What does the person inspire in you in terms of your aspirations for your own future life and work?
3)         Do you agree that political parties are in “decline, decay, and demise” (Bowman 93) in the US? Why or why not? Cite specific examples.
4)         Define the term “capacity” as it relates to state and local governments and the agencies or organizations that help fill in the gaps left by state and local governments. Apply this term to the ability of your community partner, or aborted community partner, to meet its goals.
5)         What are the roles of interest groups, lobbyists and PACs within our democracy? Are these roles generally positive or negative?
6)         Define “subsidiarity” as you understand it thus far in the semester. How might the process of “devolution” be related to subsidiarity?
7)         Reflect on the term “charity” and how it differs from “service,” “service learning,” or “community engagement.” Which of these terms best reflects the call to “honor the dignity and sacredness of each person” (Hallmarks)?
8)         Reflect on the term “community” and the way it is used in the Hallmarks. In what ways does your community partner organization attempt to develop community with and for the people it serves? What are the unique needs of the people served by your CP?


Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Midterm Prep

Dear Students,

In addition to the key terms and phrases we reviewed in class, and which you should be able to define and use, please consider the following with regard to your community partner projects as you've experienced them so far.

1) Be able to define the term "capacity" and apply it to the ability of your community partner (or aborted community partners) to meet its goals.

2) Reflect on the term "charity" and how it differs from "service," "service learning," or "community engagement." Which of these terms best reflects the call to "honor the dignity and sacredness of each person"?

3) Reflect on the term "community" and the way it is used in the Hallmarks. In what ways does your community partner organization attempt to develop community with and for the people it serves? What are the unique needs of the people served by your CP?

Monday, February 8, 2016

Schedule

Andrews/State & Local Government – Spring 2016

Day-by-Day Schedule of Activities & Assignments
Schedule subject to change due to speaker availability!


WEEK ONE

January 14
Introductions; syllabus; FAQ & course overview. Create blog using blogger.com. Community Engagement project – choosing your Community Partner and applying for your Community Engagement Internship.




WEEK TWO

January 19
What are state & local governments? CP selection & application.
DUE: Chapter 1 New Directions for State & Local Government.
ALSO DUE: Draft a letter of application to your first-choice and second-choice Community Engagement Internship positions. Do not send the letter yet. Be sure to include the following elements as appropriate: Introduce yourself; Why you want this position; Your qualifications for this position (skills &/or experience); The time commitment as you understand it; How you will get to the work site; and any other elements we discuss in class on January 14.



January 21
How do state and local governments differ from the Federal government? Why do we have them?
DUE: Chapter 2 Federalism & the States.
Blog Topic #1: In what sense did your 1st or 2nd choice CP arise from a local need or perspective? Why do you think local governments did not fill this need adequately? To whom is your CP accountable? Is your CP constrained or affected by Federal policies?
ALSO DUE: Resume. Submit revised letters of application, along with resume, to Ms. Andrews by email: pandrews@ndnu.edu. Use the resources at NDNU’s Career Services office as needed to help prepare your application materials. Be sure to schedule an appointment ahead of time if you want to meet with someone at the Career Services office in person. http://www.ndnu.edu/campus-life/career-services/





WEEK THREE

January 26
State-Local relations. Internship assignments made.
DUE: Chapter 10 State-Local Relations
Blog Topic #2: Why is there tension between the state and local levels of government? In what ways is this tension healthy for our political system overall?




January 28
The importance of citizen participation within a democracy. In class close reading workshop on CST handout (Participation and the Common Good).
DUE: Chapter 4 Citizen Participation & Elections.
ALSO DUE: Bring at least three different colored pens or highlighters to class today.
Blog Topic #3: What do you know about the relationship between citizens and your CP? On what levels do they interact? How can citizen participation affect your CP – use the concepts outlined in your textbook to answer this question.




WEEK FOUR

February 2
The importance of citizen participation within a democracy – community activism. Guest Speaker Meda Okelo. DATE IS CONFIRMED.


February 4
The importance of citizen participation within a democracy – why and how do nuns become socially engaged in political or social causes? Guest Speakers Margaret Hoffman, SND, and Sister Mary Oladimeji. DATE IS CONFIRMED.
DUE: Read handout on early lives and education of SND Foundresses Julie Billiart and Francoise Blin de Bourdon



WEEK FIVE

February 9
State-Local relations: the notion of subsidiarity and the “proper” role of the various levels of government.
DUE: CST handout – Subsidiarity and the Proper Role of Government
Blog Topic #4: Define “subsidiarity” in your own words. How is the concept of subsidiarity as discussed in today’s reading related to “devolution”as described in your textbook? Google “devolution in Kenya” for an ambitious example of how governments might use devolution to achieve a desireable level of subsidiarity.




February 11
Political parties, interest groups and campaigns. What it’s like to be a committee member of a local branch of a major political party &/or subsidiarity and the proper role of government. Guest Speaker Bill Campbell. DATE IS CONFIRMED.




Extra Credit activity: Participate in one or more Founders’ Week events this week.
Extra Credit Blog Topic for FW: Describe the activities in which you participated. What did you learn about our Foundresses, or about the History or Mission of Notre Dame de Namur learning institutions this week? Discuss how the values of the Sisters / Hallmarks might help a student think more clearly about his or her own career and life decisions.




WEEK SIX

February 16
Political parties, interest groups and campaigns.
DUE: Chapter 5 Political Parties, Interest Groups & Campaigns



February 18
Challenging and updating a State Constitution. Guest Speaker John Lewis on challenges to marriage equality at the state constitution level and marriage equality as a civil rights issue. DATE IS CONFIRMED
DUE: Chapter 3 State Constitutions
Blog Topic #5: Find and summarize a case study about an effort to update or challenge a state constitution. If your CP has engaged in this kind of advocacy, you may use your CP as an example.





WEEK SEVEN

February 23
Governors.
DUE: Chapter 7 Governors.




February 25
Midterm review. Oral communication and presentation techniques… life beyond PowerPoint.
DUE: Essay in response to Guest Speakers. Summarize and respond to the talks of three of our Guest Speakers to date. In your response, indicate where you agree and where you disagree with the Speaker. Be sure to discuss why you agree or disagree with the Speaker. Ground your discussion in specific content from our textbook and a formal system of ethical values such as the Hallmarks. (3 pages.)
ALSO DUE: Timesheet Status Check




WEEK EIGHT

March 1
Interim Presentations. 10-minute group presentations introducing your CP, how does its work fulfill or supplement the goals of a state or local government, etc. / what is the work involved? / what has been enjoyable about it so far? / what problems or challenges have arisen so far? / choose 2-3 Hallmarks that seem most relevant to this organization / what do you most look forward to for the remainder of the internship? Include a Powerpoint or poster board with images that enhance your presentation.




March 3
Midterm Exam. Research project assigned (8 pages).
DUE: Study for midterm




SPRING BREAK WEEK

March 8-10  Enjoy your week off!





WEEK NINE

March 15
In-class writing activity relating to Research Project. One-on-one mid-semester reviews.




March 17
State Legislatures. In-class workshop on Research Project.
DUE: Chapter 6 State Legislatures
Blog Topic #6: Choose one or more of the focus questions at the beginning of Chapter 6. Use this blog entry to answer the question(s).




WEEK TEN

March 22
The Judiciary. One on one review of research project proposals.
DUE: Chapter 9 The Judiciary
ALSO DUE: Draft of Research Project Proposal: Brief project proposal (2 pages). What is the question you propose to answer? What has already been written about it? How is your question unique? What kind of research will help you answer the question? How will this research be conducted? How might your findings be used?




March 24
The Judiciary. Guest speaker Anne Boulianne. CAN’T DO IT THIS YEAR. 
DUE: Chapter 9 The Judiciary
ALSO DUE: Research Project Proposal






WEEK ELEVEN

March 29
Local government structure and leadership. Preflection for Call to Action Day.
DUE: Chapter 11 Local Government Structure & Leadership
Blog Topic #7: How does your CP interface with local governmental units? Be specific. Are there any leaders in particular who have had an important impact on the success or development of your CP?
ALSO DUE: Timesheet Status Check




March 31
Call to Action Day. Class activity. Participation in CTA Day is part of your Community Engagement activities.




WEEK TWELVE

April 5
Reflection on CTA Day. Research Project status check. Local government role play.
DUE: Research Project Status Check – bring write-up… whatever state it’s in
CTA Day Reflection. Blog about your participation in Call to Action Day. In what ways did the activity reflect any of the themes we have explored so far this semester? In what ways did it reflect any of the values expressed in the Hallmarks of the SNDs?




April 7
Local government structure and leadership. Guest Speaker Debbie Bacigalupi, 2012 candidate for California’s 14th Congressional District, will speak about regional and global initiatives that might erode the rights of individuals and localities. Debbie is also an alumna of NDNU.






WEEK THIRTEEN

April 12
Local government structure and leadership. Guest Speaker John Phelps on school districts and Charter Schools. DATE IS CONFIRMED.




April 14
Public administration: budgeting and service delivery. Local government role play.
DUE: Chapter 8 Public Administration: Budgeting & Service Delivery
Blog Topic #8: “A budget is a statement of values.” Discuss the way your CP gets and spends its money or resources is a reflection of its values. Which Hallmarks, if any, are expressed in the way your CP manages its budgeting and service delivery?




WEEK FOURTEEN

April 19
Taxing and spending. Local government role play.
DUE: Chapter 12 Taxing & Spending
Blog Topic #9: Does your CP rely on money or services provided by any other entity (public or private)? Are the money or services provided in a consistent and reliable manner or is the CP subject to periodic application, approval, re-application, etc.? How does this consistency, or lack thereof, affect your CP’s operations? Do other people or organizations rely on your CP to provide funding?
ALSO DUE: Research project write-up




April 21
Final exam – written portion. MVE reflection.
DUE: Study for the final
Blog Topic #10: Do in class. See worksheet distributed in class.




WEEK FIFTEEN

April 26 & 28
Final research project presentations

the end!